Private credit is a $2 trillion shadow lending market where non-bank investment firms raise capital from investors and lend it directly to private businesses — and it's currently showing some serious cracks. Once called the hot new thing on Wall Street, private credit is now facing surging default rates, a wave of panicked investor withdrawals, and major funds actively freezing redemptions. Stock prices for firms like Blackstone, KKR, and Blue Owl have dropped anywhere from 20% to over 50% since September. So what exactly is private credit, why has it gotten so big, and should you be worried? Let's break it all down.
What Is Private Credit and Why Is It So Risky?
While the technical definition of private credit covers any debt that isn't publicly traded, it essentially works like the lending version of private equity. Investment firms raise capital from wealthy investors, use that capital to lend money directly to private companies, and then collect fees and pass along the returns. Think of it as a bank — except it operates outside the traditional banking system with far less regulation and oversight.
02:15
Richard explains how private credit grew 10x from 2009 to 2023, filling the gap left by post-2008 banking regulations
Watch at 02:15 →
That lack of oversight is exactly what makes it risky. Because these loans aren't publicly traded, there's no real-time price discovery. The value of the loans largely depends on internal appraisals, and those appraisals are often done by the same firms that have a financial incentive to keep values high and fees flowing. When something goes wrong — like a borrower going bankrupt — values can collapse almost overnight, from 100 cents on the dollar to below 20 cents, with very little warning to outside investors.
Most private credit loans are also floating rate, meaning borrowers pay more when interest rates are high. After years of near-zero rates, today's elevated rate environment is squeezing the businesses that took on these loans, pushing more of them toward default.
What Is Shadow Banking and How Did It Get So Big?
Private credit is one of the most prominent examples of what economists call shadow banking — financial activity that looks and feels like banking but happens outside the regulated banking system. Non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs) like private equity firms, hedge funds, and insurance companies all fall under this umbrella.
06:40
Overview of major private credit fund gates: Blackstone, Cliffwater, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, and Blue Owl redemption restrictions
Watch at 06:40 →
The reason shadow banking exploded after 2008 is almost ironic: it was partly caused by the regulations designed to prevent another financial crisis. After the Great Recession, banks faced strict new capital requirements that made riskier lending — like loans to small and mid-sized businesses — far less attractive. Banks shifted toward safer assets like Treasury bonds and high-quality mortgage-backed securities.
That left a massive gap in the market for business lending. Private credit funds stepped in, happy to fill the void. And why wouldn't they? They could charge higher fees, operate with minimal regulatory scrutiny, and pitch investors on returns that looked great compared to the low-yield bond market of the 2010s. McKinsey estimates that private credit grew 10-fold between 2009 and 2023, reaching roughly $2 trillion in the US alone — compared to an $11 trillion US corporate bond market.
Why Are Private Credit Funds Freezing Withdrawals?
The trouble started gaining serious momentum in September 2024, when two companies — subprime auto lender Tricolor and car parts supplier First Brands — filed for bankruptcy on combined debts of over $10 billion. Private credit lenders took heavy losses almost instantly, with loan values crashing from par to below 20 cents on the dollar. Executives at both companies have since been charged with fraud, including allegedly double-pledging assets as collateral.
That triggered a broader panic. Investors in retail-focused private credit funds started submitting redemption requests at record levels, and funds didn't have enough liquid assets to meet the demand. Here's a snapshot of what followed:
11:20
Default rate estimates compared across Fitch, Morgan Stanley, and UBS — showing wide variability due to opaque reporting
Watch at 11:20 →
- Blackstone's BCRED ($83B fund): Saw redemptions hit 7.9% of holdings. Blackstone and senior employees personally invested $400 million to lift the gate and meet requests.
- Cliffwater's $33B fund: Withdrawal requests surged to 14%; the company agreed to repurchase 7% of shares.
- BlackRock and Morgan Stanley: Both adhered to their 5% redemption caps amid roughly 10% withdrawal demand.
- Blue Owl Capital Corp 2: Temporarily halted redemptions in November, then completely froze them in February to liquidate assets and return capital.
These gates aren't necessarily illegal or even unusual for private markets — they exist precisely to prevent a fire sale of illiquid assets. But the fact that so many funds hit their limits simultaneously is the part that's raising eyebrows.
What Happened to Blackstone's $83 Billion Credit Fund?
Blackstone's BCRED (Blackstone Private Credit Fund) is the flagship example of the stress hitting the private credit space. It had long been held up as a success story — its fund has returned approximately 9.8% annually since inception, which looks exceptional compared to traditional investment-grade bonds.
But redemption pressure forced Blackstone to take the unusual step of having its own executives personally invest $400 million into the fund to stabilize it and allow investors to exit. While Blackstone framed this as a show of confidence, critics noted that you generally don't need to inject hundreds of millions of your own money into a fund that's performing just fine.
BCRED's struggles reflect a broader issue: many of these funds were sold to retail-adjacent investors who expected more liquidity than private credit can realistically offer. When sentiment turns and everyone wants out at once, even the biggest and most well-managed funds face a structural mismatch between investor expectations and the nature of the underlying assets.
How Do Today's Default Rates Compare to 2008?
This is where the data gets murky — and intentionally so, given how opaque the private credit market is. But here's what we know:
- Fitch reported that private credit defaults hit a new high of 9.2% in early 2025, up from 8.1% in 2024 and above pandemic-era highs.
- Morgan Stanley puts the figure lower at 4.5% as of December 2024, but projects it could reach 8% — again above 2020 peaks.
- UBS estimates a worst-case scenario of 15% default rates in the space.
For context, Fitch's headline figure is based on just 302 companies, and their analyst-adjusted measure puts defaults at 5.4%. Higher default rates also appear concentrated among smaller borrowers — companies with debt under $25 million are defaulting at 15.8%, compared to 4% for those with over $100 million in debt.
The comparison to 2008 is tempting but imperfect. Back then, the entire financial system was interconnected through complex mortgage derivatives that stacked risk on top of risk. Private credit doesn't have that same derivative layer — yet. But it does have something concerning: US banks have lent an estimated $300 billion to private credit funds, meaning bank balance sheets aren't entirely insulated from the fallout.
Is Private Credit Going to Cause the Next Financial Crisis?
The honest answer is: probably not on the same scale as 2008 — but that doesn't mean there's nothing to worry about.
The systemic risk appears more limited this time around. There's no massive derivative market amplifying exposure. The $300 billion in bank loans to private credit funds, while significant, represents only about 6% of total US bank loans. And many private credit funds still report non-accrual rates below their 10-year averages, suggesting the majority of loans are still performing.
High-yield credit spreads — a key indicator of market appetite for risky debt — remain meaningfully lower than they've been for most of the past decade. That's not a sign of imminent collapse. S&P Global also reports that US speculative-grade default rates have actually trended downward in 2025, averaging 3.69% for the year.
That said, the potential for broader damage is real. Private credit is a major funding source for small and medium-sized businesses. If defaults spike and lenders pull back, credit availability could tighten, hurting business growth, employment, and economic activity in ways that reach well beyond wealthy investors. Pensions and insurance funds also have exposure, meaning everyday people's retirement savings and insurance payouts could be affected.
AI disruption adds another layer of concern. Private credit funds have heavy exposure to software companies — about 25% of BDC portfolios are in software — and those companies are facing both technological disruption and a wall of debt maturities, with 31% of software loans coming due in the next two years.
Should Regular Investors Stay Away from Private Credit?
Private credit was never really designed for individual investors. It was built for institutions and ultra-high-net-worth clients who could tolerate long lockup periods and illiquidity. The recent push to democratize access — through 401(k) rule changes, business development companies, and semi-liquid evergreen funds — has put retail investors into a product that often doesn't match their liquidity needs or risk tolerance.
JP Morgan has argued that elevated redemption requests are driven more by sentiment than fundamentals, which may be true. But sentiment is exactly why retail investors tend to withdraw at the worst possible times, triggering the very liquidity crises that make things worse for everyone.
If you're considering private credit exposure, the key questions to ask are: Can you afford to lock up this money for 5–10 years? Do you understand that valuations are largely self-reported? And are you comfortable with the possibility that defaults could spike significantly in a recession? If the answer to any of those is no, this probably isn't the right corner of the market for you.
The private credit story is still being written. The opacity that makes it hard to diagnose is the same opacity that could let problems fester longer than they should. Whether this ends as a contained correction or something more serious depends heavily on factors — tariffs, interest rates, AI disruption, macroeconomic conditions — that no one has fully figured out yet. What's clear is that this is a space worth watching closely.
